All the articles, which are received by the editorial board, are reviewed. The aim of the review is to promote a strict selection of author’s manuscripts for publication and to make concrete recommendations for their improvement. The procedure of reviewing is focused on the most objective assessment of the scientific article’s content, identification of its compliance with the magazine. Also reviewing provides a comprehensive analysis of advantages and disadvantages of article materials.

Only those articles that are valuable from a scientific point of view and contribute to solving current economic problems and tasks are published.

Dear Reviewer!

You are reported that manuscript which was sent is an intellectual property of authors and related to the information that remains confidential. Reviewers could not copy submitted for review articles or use knowledge about the content of the article before its publication.

We would like to ask you to use special form for reviewing materials presented for reviewing by Editorial board.

Ethics and security

European Journal of Social and Human Sciences editors may seek advice about submitted papers not only from technical reviewers but also on any aspect of a paper that raises concerns. These may include, for example, ethical issues or issues of access to data or materials. Very occasionally, concerns may also relate to the implications to society of publishing a paper, including threats to security. In such circumstances, advice will usually be sought simultaneously with the technical peer-review process. As in all publishing decisions, the ultimate decision as to whether to publish is the responsibility of the editor of the journal concerned.